1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

precise location. One account speaks of coaches at the end of the wharf. We
can see standard gauge remains just past the end of the filled mole near the
freight slip in the 1902 photos. Photography shows only partial views.
What we can see is that the Terminal had been segregated with standard
gauge to the north half of the Terminal and narrow gauge to the south. The
southern extension of the wharf may be represented on current navigation
charts as a mound at about the 10 foot depth contour.

On balance, the chances are good that some of the coach metal parts will be
accessible, if they have survived. We should see metal coach remains laid
out roughly where they were deposited during the fire. The largest pieces
will be wheel and axle sets about thirty feet apart, with truss rods, brake
cylinders and other artifacts in between, and couplers and draft gear, brake
wheels and platform grab irons in the shorter intervals. The remains may
extend up to 1000 feet from shore.

Proton magnetometer survey
Our visit with Navy unexploded ordnance expert Joe Vann at Mare Island,
was most informative. Joe and his colleagues spend a great deal of their
time finding buried metal. Using a device called a proton magnetometer,
the site can be scanned and a map generated showing the location and
mass of metallic objects down to a fairly small size. The scan and analysis
would takea week of work by a team of three at a cost of about $8,000.
Actual recovery would require divers and some support equipment.
Recording the locations of exhumed artifacts on a site grid will be essential
to interpretation. It is the evolution of narrow gauge coach design during
the formative period of 1876 to 1887 that we are interested in, and, as
Randy Hees reported in Issue #3 of this newsletter, we have enough
information to precisely identify the coaches if we know which artifacts are
physically associated with the remains of a particular coach.

Coming Events

An important next step will be to place the site on the National Register of
Historic Places. This will afford a measure of future protection for the site.
The Navy will issue their Draft Environmental Impact Statement (which
covers matters archæological) for public comment, probably early next

IMAGE
imgs/Issue_402.gif

Samuel Knight Chapter SIA Newsletter

November 30, 1997

Page 14